Skip to content
Search resources Open menu

Tag

Articles You Should Have

Parent-Child Conversations, Principe and London, 2022

Principe and London review research on how conversations between parents and children can shape children’s memories before formal forensic interviews. They explain how parental questions, suggestions, and shared retellings may influence children’s accounts and discuss implications for interviewing and evaluating young witnesses.

COUNTERING Counterintuitive Testimony (Child, handout)

This State Bar of Arizona handout examines testimony about children’s responses and behavior in child sexual abuse cases. It surveys issues including disclosure timing, changing accounts, continued contact, interviewing practices, possible confounds, confirmation bias, and research relevant to evaluating competing explanations.

Explaining Counterintuitive Victim Behavior in Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault Cases

This 2006 prosecution guide discusses expert testimony offered to explain behavior in domestic-violence and sexual-assault cases, such as delayed reporting, recantation, or continued contact with an alleged offender. It describes possible uses and limits of such testimony, stresses that admissibility depends on the jurisdiction and facts, and addresses considerations when a victim is not cooperating with prosecution.

Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science. Lundregan

This 1996 National Institute of Justice report presents case studies in which post-conviction DNA testing helped establish innocence and examines how those cases unfolded. The authors discuss investigative and trial factors, laboratory testing and evidence preservation, as well as limits of DNA interpretation in cases with multiple possible contributors, and consider policy implications for the justice system.

Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science, Pages 19-20

These pages reproduce portions of a 1996 United States Department of Justice report examining DNA testing in cases involving convicted defendants. They describe recurring features of the cases and summarize a survey of crime laboratories, including reported rates of inconclusive results and tests that excluded suspects, while noting evidence-handling concerns and limits on interpreting the figures.

Gender Differences in Children’s Disclosures and Legal Narratives of Sexual Abuse

This dissertation analyzes disclosure patterns and interview narratives from 20 children whose sexual abuse was corroborated, examining gender differences, reasons for delayed disclosure, and narrative detail and structure. The author reports sample-specific differences and discusses methodological limits, including the small sample and limits on generalizing the findings.

Child Forensic Interviewing: Best Practices

This United States Department of Justice bulletin consolidates guidance on conducting forensic interviews with children in alleged abuse cases. It discusses interview purpose, preparation, rapport, open-ended questions, interview stages, and team coordination, while emphasizing that children’s accounts and needs differ and that repeated or overly focused questioning can create problems.

Extended Forensic Evaluation When Sexual Abuse Is Suspected: A Multisite Field Study

This multisite study evaluates an extended forensic assessment model for children whose suspected-abuse cases may need more than one interview, using data from 147 participants across 12 states. The authors report credible disclosures in 44.5% of cases, abuse-unlikely findings in 19%, and unresolved outcomes in 36%, so the study does not identify all non-disclosures as false allegations.